MBA Mondays — Chapter-by-Chapter Outline

Author: Fred Wilson First published: 2010–2013 (blog series on AVC.com); compiled as a Leanpub book in 2013; illustrated edition (with Jason Li) published at mba-mondays-illustrated.com in 2015 Edition covered: The MBA Mondays Illustrated compiled edition (2015), which organizes approximately 100 posts from the original AVC.com series into eight thematic sections. The original series ran from January 2010 through late 2013 and comprised roughly 114 posts. This outline treats each major thematic section as a chapter, following the book's own organizational structure.

---

Central thesis

MBA Mondays argues that the core concepts taught in business school — accounting, finance, equity compensation, operations, fundraising, M&A, and governance — are not arcane or inaccessible. A working founder, operator, or early employee at a technology startup can learn the essentials in plain English without an MBA, and that knowledge directly improves the decisions they make every week.

Wilson writes from thirty years of experience as a venture capitalist, watching startups succeed and fail often on the basis of whether their founders understood basic business mechanics. The series is not theoretical: every concept is connected to a real decision a startup will face — when to raise venture debt instead of dilutive equity, how to structure a vesting schedule that retains key employees, when to walk away from an acquisition offer, how a burn rate translates into a fundraising deadline.

If you don't understand the basics of business, you are flying blind. And flying blind is a great way to crash.

---

Chapter 1 — Finance and Accounting Foundations

Central question

What financial concepts does every startup founder need to understand before they can read a balance sheet, evaluate an investment, or run a board meeting?

Main argument

Wilson opens the series by establishing the mathematical and accounting bedrock on which everything else rests. He argues that most founders are intimidated by finance because they were never taught its core concepts clearly, and that the remedy is a handful of clearly explained ideas — not a semester of coursework.

The time value of money

Money available today is worth more than the same amount available in the future, because today's money can be invested and earn a return. Wilson presents this as one of the top three concepts every businessperson should know: once you understand it, you understand opportunity costs, discounted cash flows, and why investors demand a return premium for illiquid or risky assets. The underlying formula is the discount rate applied to a future cash flow: PV = FV / (1 + r)^n, where r is the required rate of return and n is the number of periods.

Compounding interest

The mirror image of discounting: money invested at a rate of return grows exponentially over time. Compounding explains how a small equity stake in a startup that grows 10x over four years generates dramatically more wealth than a salary, and it explains why early investors receive a larger return per dollar than later investors — they bore the risk earlier and held longer.

How to calculate a return on investment

ROI = (Value at exit − Value at entry) / Value at entry. Wilson walks through this in startup-equity terms: the goal for seed investors is typically a 10x return on invested capital; for later-stage venture, 5–7x. Understanding IRR (internal rate of return) — which accounts for the time between investment and exit — is equally important, because a 10x return in ten years is far less impressive than the same multiple in three years.

The present value of future cash flows

Companies are worth the present value of all the cash flows they will produce in the future, discounted at an appropriate rate. Wilson uses this to demystify startup valuations: a venture investor who pays $10 million for 20% of a startup is implicitly claiming that the company's future discounted cash flows will be worth at least $50 million. The discount rate for early-stage companies is high — often 30–50% — because of execution risk and illiquidity.

Corporate entities

Before taking any investment, a startup must be incorporated as the right type of legal entity. Wilson explains C-corporations (required for venture investment in the US), S-corporations (pass-through taxation, limited to 100 shareholders), LLCs, and partnerships. Most technology startups incorporate as Delaware C-corporations because Delaware corporate law is well-established, investor-friendly, and familiar to every venture lawyer.

Piercing the corporate veil

A corporation protects its owners from personal liability — but only if founders maintain real separation between corporate and personal finances, follow corporate formalities (board meetings, resolutions), and do not commingle funds. Wilson describes the conditions under which courts will "pierce the corporate veil" and hold founders personally liable, and argues that respecting corporate formalities is not bureaucratic overhead but essential legal hygiene.

Key ideas

• The time value of money underlies all of finance: a future dollar is worth less than a present dollar by the factor (1 + r)^n.
• Compounding is the mechanism by which early investments in high-growth companies generate outsized returns.
• ROI and IRR are distinct: IRR corrects for timing and should be the primary return metric for venture investors.
• Present value of future cash flows is the correct theoretical basis for valuing any business, including pre-revenue startups.
• Delaware C-corp is the standard entity for VC-backed US startups; other structures create friction with investors.
• Piercing the corporate veil is a real risk when founders treat company money as personal money.

Key takeaway

The handful of concepts underlying all business finance — time value of money, compounding, discounting, ROI — can be learned in an afternoon and change how founders think about every subsequent decision.

---

Chapter 2 — Accounting: The Three Financial Statements

Central question

What do the three financial statements actually measure, how do they relate to each other, and how should a startup founder read them?

Main argument

Wilson argues that most founders are allergic to accounting because they associate it with tax compliance and bureaucracy rather than management intelligence. The three financial statements — the profit and loss statement (P&L), the balance sheet, and the cash flow statement — are actually a coherent model of the company's financial reality, and reading them together reveals things that reading any one alone cannot.

The profit and loss statement

The P&L reports changes in income and expense accounts over a period of time (month, quarter, year). Its structure:

• Revenue (the "top line"): earned during the period, recorded on an accrual basis — not when cash is received, but when the service or product is delivered.
• Cost of revenues: direct costs of producing the revenue (hosting, payment processing, content licensing).
• Gross margin = Revenue − Cost of revenues. High gross margin (>70%) is the defining financial characteristic of great software businesses; it means the company retains most of each revenue dollar to fund growth.
• Operating expenses: R&D, sales and marketing, general and administrative costs.
• Operating income = Gross margin − Operating expenses. Positive operating income means the core business is self-sustaining. Negative operating income means the company requires external capital to survive.
• Net income (the "bottom line"): operating income after interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.

Wilson stresses that he almost never looks at a P&L in isolation: it must be read alongside the balance sheet.

The balance sheet

The balance sheet is a snapshot of all asset and liability account balances at a specific moment. Its structure:

• Assets: cash and equivalents, accounts receivable (revenue earned but not yet collected), prepaid expenses, property and equipment, and intangibles.
• Liabilities: accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue (cash received but service not yet delivered), and long-term debt.
• Equity: the cumulative net investment in the company (paid-in capital plus retained earnings/losses).

The fundamental accounting identity: Assets = Liabilities + Equity. The balance sheet and P&L are "two sides of the same coin": every transaction that touches the P&L also touches the balance sheet.

Cash flow

The cash flow statement reconciles net income to actual cash generated or consumed. A profitable company can burn cash (if it is collecting receivables slowly or investing heavily in inventory), and an unprofitable company can generate cash temporarily (by collecting deferred revenue upfront). Wilson's simplified calculation:

1. Start with net income.
2. Subtract increases in current and non-current assets (receivables growing means cash is tied up).
3. Add increases in liabilities (payables growing means the company is using supplier credit).
4. Add equity raises (new investment).
5. The result should match the actual change in cash balance.

For forecasting, Wilson recommends projecting the P&L first, then deriving the cash flow statement, and finally the balance sheet.

Analyzing financial statements together

Wilson identifies the diagnostic signals that only emerge from reading all three together: high receivables relative to revenue signals collection problems; negative cash flow despite positive net income signals heavy capital expenditure; deferred revenue on the balance sheet signals a healthy subscription business collecting cash in advance.

Key ideas

• Revenue is recognized when earned, not when cash is received; this distinction is the source of most accounting confusion.
• Gross margin is the single most important profitability ratio for a software startup.
• Operating income measures whether the core business is viable without external capital.
• The balance sheet and P&L are complementary and must be read together.
• Profitable businesses can and do run out of cash; cash flow is a separate and independent measure.
• Deferred revenue (cash in but service not yet delivered) is a liability on the balance sheet — a health signal dressed as a risk.

Key takeaway

The three financial statements form a closed model of a company's financial reality; reading any one without the others produces a partial and potentially misleading picture.

---

Chapter 3 — Building a Company: Budgeting, Projections, and Key Metrics

Central question

How should startups project their financial future, build operating budgets, and track the metrics that matter?

Main argument

Wilson argues that financial planning is not a finance-department exercise: it is how a founder communicates their business model to employees, investors, and partners. A budget is a commitment; a forecast is a hypothesis. Both serve specific purposes and demand different levels of rigor.

Key business metrics

Every business has a handful of metrics that, if they move in the right direction, almost guarantee success. Wilson argues founders should identify the two or three metrics that are the leading indicators of their business model and track them obsessively. For an e-commerce business, that might be conversion rate, average order value, and repeat purchase rate. For a SaaS company, it might be monthly recurring revenue (MRR), churn rate, and customer acquisition cost. The point is not to track everything — dashboards with 50 metrics obscure more than they reveal — but to identify the vital few.

Bookings vs. revenues vs. collections

Wilson introduces three distinct financial concepts that founders often conflate:

• Bookings: a customer commits to pay (the contract is signed); this is a business momentum metric, not a financial statement item.
• Revenue: the service or product is delivered and the company earns the right to recognize income on the P&L.
• Collections: cash is actually received.

For a subscription SaaS company that invoices annually, a $120,000 contract is a booking on day one, $10,000 of monthly revenue thereafter, and a collection of $120,000 on the invoice payment date. Wilson also describes the book-to-bill ratio (bookings divided by revenues in the same period): a ratio consistently above 1.0 signals accelerating growth; below 1.0 signals deceleration.

Projections and budgeting

Wilson distinguishes three planning modes:

• Early-stage budgets: cash-based, focused entirely on runway. The question is not "can we be profitable?" but "can we reach our next milestone before we run out of money?"
• Growing-company budgets: department-level operating plans, with hiring plans driving the expense model and revenue projections built on pipeline and conversion assumptions.
• Large-company budgets: top-down revenue targets allocated to business units, with formal variance analysis against prior periods.

Scenarios

Because startups operate in conditions of high uncertainty, Wilson strongly advocates building three scenarios — base, optimistic, and pessimistic — rather than a single-point forecast. The scenarios are not just about different revenue assumptions; they should reflect genuinely different business outcomes and generate different hiring, spending, and fundraising implications.

Forecasting

Forecasting is iterative: the first forecast is built bottom-up (how many customers can sales realistically close?), but subsequent forecasts are refined by actual performance data. Wilson emphasizes that a company whose actuals consistently beat or miss its forecast has a broken forecasting process — accurate self-knowledge about the business is itself a competitive advantage.

Key ideas

• Every business has two or three leading metrics that determine its fate; founders should identify and instrument them before building dashboards.
• Bookings, revenues, and collections are three distinct numbers that diverge significantly in subscription businesses; conflating them is dangerous.
• The book-to-bill ratio is a clean real-time growth signal.
• Early-stage budgets are fundamentally about runway, not profitability.
• Three-scenario planning forces honest confrontation with the worst case and creates contingency plans before they are needed.
• Accurate forecasting is itself a form of organizational competence.

Key takeaway

Financial planning disciplines a founder's assumptions about their business model and communicates those assumptions to everyone who needs to act on them.

---

Chapter 4 — Economics and Finance Concepts for Operators

Central question

Which economic and financial concepts from the MBA curriculum are most directly relevant to startup operators, and how do they apply to real decisions?

Main argument

Wilson selects a subset of economics and corporate finance concepts that have direct operational implications for startups, and explains each through concrete examples rather than academic formulas. The goal is not comprehensiveness — it is relevance.

Risk and return

The foundational trade-off of all investing: higher expected returns require accepting higher risk. For startups, this principle explains why early-stage investors demand 10x return targets (they face maximum execution risk and illiquidity) while later-stage investors accept 3–5x (the company has de-risked its product and market). It also explains why employee equity should be priced at a discount to the company's last round — the employee's equity is less liquid and carries more risk than an investor's preferred stock.

Diversification

A single investment in a startup is highly risky; a portfolio of twenty uncorrelated startup investments has a much lower probability of total loss. This is why venture capital funds — not individual angels — are the structurally rational vehicle for early-stage investing. Wilson notes that this also applies to operators: a startup whose revenue is 80% concentrated in one customer has undiversified revenue risk that it should address before raising a growth round.

Opportunity costs

Every choice forecloses alternatives. When a startup spends $500K on a custom engineering project, the opportunity cost is everything else that money could have bought — a sales team, a product manager, a marketing campaign. Wilson argues that opportunity cost thinking is systematically underused in startups, where founders tend to evaluate projects on their absolute merits rather than against the alternatives they crowd out.

Sunk costs

Money already spent should not influence forward-looking decisions. A startup that has invested eighteen months and $2 million in a product direction that is not working should not continue down that path because of the prior investment — the right question is whether the next dollar spent in that direction has a positive expected return. Wilson observes that sunk cost reasoning is one of the most common and costly cognitive errors in startup management.

Enterprise value vs. market capitalization

Enterprise value = market capitalization + debt − cash. For a company with no debt and substantial cash, enterprise value is meaningfully below market cap. When evaluating acquisition offers or comparable public company valuations, Wilson argues founders should always normalize to enterprise value rather than market cap to avoid apples-to-oranges comparisons.

EBITDA and valuation multiples

EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) is a common proxy for operating cash flow, widely used in acquisition pricing and public market comparables. Wilson explains that most technology acquisitions are priced at a multiple of either revenue (for early-stage companies with no profits) or EBITDA (for profitable companies). Typical software company EBITDA multiples range from 10x to 20x; the right multiple depends on growth rate, gross margin, and market position.

Commission plans

Wilson includes commission plan design as an economics topic because the incentive structure determines behavior. He argues that commission plans should be simple (salespeople should be able to calculate their commission in their head), linear above quota (avoid steep cliffs that encourage gaming the quarterly number), and capped only in specific situations (caps reduce upside for top performers and signal distrust). The most dangerous commission plan is one that pays equally for high-value and low-value accounts — it produces a salesforce that optimizes for volume over quality.

Key ideas

• Risk/return relationships explain why early investors demand larger return multiples than late investors.
• Diversification is the structural rationale for venture funds and applies to customer concentration risk as well.
• Opportunity cost is systematically underweighted in startup decisions; the correct comparison is always against the best alternative, not against zero.
• Sunk costs should be ignored in forward-looking decisions — this is intellectually obvious but emotionally difficult.
• Enterprise value, not market cap, is the correct unit for M&A comparisons.
• EBITDA multiples are the most common acquisition valuation benchmark for profitable tech companies.
• Commission plan design is an incentive engineering problem; simplicity and linearity are virtues.

Key takeaway

A small set of economic concepts — opportunity cost, sunk costs, risk/return, diversification — if internalized, directly improve dozens of the recurring decisions startup operators make each quarter.

---

Chapter 5 — Employee Equity

Central question

How should startups design, communicate, and manage equity compensation so that it actually aligns employees' interests with the company's long-term success?

Main argument

Wilson argues that employee equity is the most powerful alignment tool available to startups — and the most widely misunderstood and mismanaged. The mismanagement typically runs in one of two directions: founders give away too much too early without structure, or they give too little and communicate it poorly. A well-designed equity program creates shared ownership of outcomes; a poorly designed one creates confusion, resentment, and eventual departures.

What equity compensation is

Employee equity is a claim on the company's future value, granted as compensation for accepting below-market cash wages in exchange for upside participation. It aligns employees with shareholders: if the company grows in value, everyone's equity is worth more. Wilson emphasizes that this alignment is the point — equity is not a perk, it is a co-ownership structure.

Stock options: the mechanics

Options are the most common form of employee equity in US tech startups. A stock option grants the right to buy company stock at a fixed price (the strike price or exercise price) for a defined period (typically ten years). The key mechanics:

• Options are granted "at the money" — the strike price equals the fair market value on the grant date, as determined by a 409A independent valuation.
• "At the money" options have no immediate taxable value but carry the potential for large future value if the stock price rises.
• The two types are incentive stock options (ISOs) — for employees, with preferential tax treatment — and non-qualified stock options (NQSOs) — for contractors and advisors, taxed as ordinary income on exercise.

Vesting: earning equity over time

Vesting is the mechanism by which employees earn their equity grant over time rather than receiving it all at once. Wilson's preferred structure is a four-year vest with a one-year cliff:

• No equity vests during the first twelve months (the cliff protects the company against bad hires).
• After the cliff, equity vests monthly or quarterly for the remaining three years.
• The cliff should not be used as a weapon: Wilson argues that firing an employee the week before their cliff vests is bad faith, and companies should vest some portion even when not legally required.

Double-trigger acceleration

When a company is acquired, unvested equity is typically forfeited. Wilson strongly advocates for double-trigger acceleration: equity accelerates to fully vest only if both (1) the company is acquired and (2) the employee is subsequently terminated or materially demoted. Single-trigger acceleration (vesting on acquisition alone) is an acquirer deterrent; double-trigger is standard and fair.

The liquidation overhang

Options granted when the company's strike price was $1.00 become worthless in an acquisition at $0.50. Wilson describes the liquidation overhang problem: when a company has raised significant capital at high valuations and the business subsequently struggles, employee options may be far out of the money, removing their motivational value entirely. The solution is a repricing or a new-grant program — painful, but less costly than a demotivated team.

Restricted stock and RSUs

Restricted stock is an outright grant of shares with vesting restrictions (typically used for very early co-founder grants). Restricted stock units (RSUs) are a promise to deliver shares upon vesting, commonly used in later-stage or public companies. The tax treatment differs from options: restricted stock triggers ordinary income tax at vesting (or at grant if an 83(b) election is filed), while RSUs are taxed as ordinary income when they vest.

Dilution

Each new financing round issues new shares, reducing existing shareholders' percentage ownership — this is dilution. Wilson walks through the math: a founder who owns 70% after seed financing, 50% after Series A, 35% after Series B, and 25% after Series C has been progressively diluted, but owns 25% of a much more valuable company. Dilution is not inherently bad — it is the cost of growth capital. What matters is whether the increase in per-share value exceeds the decrease in ownership percentage.

How much equity to grant

Wilson provides a framework for scaling grants:

1. Determine the company's current best-estimate valuation (most recent round post-money, or a current 409A value).
2. Organize employees into bands with compensation multipliers:
   • Senior leadership: grant value = 0.5× annual salary
   • Director level: 0.25× salary
   • Key individual contributors: 0.1× salary
   • All others: 0.05× salary
3. Divide the grant value by current share price to determine the number of options.

Wilson stresses communicating grants in dollar values, not percentages — 0.1% of a $1B company and 0.1% of a $5M company are vastly different outcomes.

Key ideas

• Equity compensation aligns employees with shareholders; it is a co-ownership structure, not a perk.
• Options are granted "at the money" to avoid immediate tax liability; ISOs receive preferential tax treatment.
• Four-year vesting with a one-year cliff is the standard; monthly vesting thereafter is preferable to annual.
• Double-trigger acceleration is fair to employees and preserves acquirer interest.
• The liquidation overhang is a real morale problem in down-round situations and must be actively managed.
• Dilution is mathematically inevitable in a venture-backed startup; it is only harmful if capital is misallocated.
• Dollar-value framing is more honest and motivating than percentage-of-company framing for most employees.

Key takeaway

Employee equity is only an alignment tool if employees understand it: the mechanics of vesting, dilution, and liquidation preferences must be communicated plainly, and grant sizing must be calibrated to the company's current valuation, not its aspirational one.

---

Chapter 6 — Operations: What Management Teams Actually Do

Central question

What does a CEO do all day, what does a management team exist to accomplish, and how should both scale as a startup grows from product-building to business-scaling?

Main argument

Wilson argues that the most common failure mode in scaling a startup is operational — not technical, not market-related — and that this failure is usually traceable to an unclear understanding of what executives are supposed to do. The CEO's job is not to solve every problem; it is to ensure that the right people are solving the right problems. The management team's job is not to be an internal reporting structure; it is to build and execute a strategy that compound the company's advantages.

What a CEO does

Wilson distills the CEO's job into three responsibilities:

1. Set vision and strategy and communicate it to all stakeholders — employees, investors, customers, and partners.
2. Recruit, hire, and retain the best people for every role in the company.
3. Ensure there is always enough cash in the bank to fund operations.

Everything else is delegation. A CEO who spends the majority of time on any other activity is doing the wrong job. Wilson notes that great CEOs often do more than these three things, especially in the early days, but that the inability to do these three things well is disqualifying at any stage.

What a management team does

The management team exists to extend the CEO's capacity to execute across functional areas. Wilson describes the management team's core function as: set the strategy for their function, recruit and manage their team, and interface with the rest of the organization to ensure coordination. A VP of Engineering who is a great coder but cannot manage engineers, communicate with product, or recruit is the wrong person in that role — regardless of technical skill.

VP of Engineering vs. CTO

Wilson draws a clear distinction:

• The VP of Engineering is primarily a people and process manager: they own the engineering organization, manage hiring, and ensure on-time delivery against product specifications.
• The CTO is primarily a technical leader: they set architectural direction, represent the company's technical vision externally, and often lead R&D into new technology areas.

Early startups often have a CTO who does both; larger companies need both roles filled by different people.

VP Finance vs. CFO

Similarly:

• The VP Finance manages accounting, financial reporting, and financial operations — the controller function.
• The CFO is a strategic business partner who owns the financial model, leads fundraising and M&A discussions, and serves as a key member of the board-facing executive team.

Most startups hire a VP Finance first and promote to or hire a CFO when preparing for a large growth round or an IPO.

Scaling the management team across growth stages

Wilson traces how management needs evolve across three phases:

• While building product: the team is small (often five to ten people), the CEO is directly involved in all functions, and the management layer is thin. The primary hiring need is individual contributors who can build.
• While building usage: the product exists; the challenge is distribution. The team needs a head of marketing or growth who can run systematic experiments, and a head of customer success to reduce churn.
• While building the business: revenues are real and growing; the challenge is organizational scaling. The company needs all the functional heads (VP Engineering, VP Product, VP Sales, VP Marketing, CFO, General Counsel), clear reporting structures, and formalized operating rhythms (weekly leadership meetings, monthly business reviews, quarterly planning).

Key ideas

• The CEO has exactly three jobs: vision/strategy, talent, and cash. Everything else is delegation.
• Management team members own their functional strategy, team, and cross-functional interface — not just their team.
• VP of Engineering and CTO are distinct roles that should not be permanently conflated.
• VP Finance and CFO are distinct roles: the CFO is a strategic partner, not an accounting manager.
• Management team composition should evolve with company stage: early companies need builders; growth companies need leaders who can scale organizations.
• The transition from founder-run to management-team-run is the single most difficult operational challenge in startup scaling.

Key takeaway

A startup's management team should be designed around what the company needs to accomplish at its current stage, not around the titles and org charts of larger companies.

---

Chapter 7 — Financing Options

Central question

What are the full range of financing options available to technology startups at different stages, and what are the trade-offs between them?

Main argument

Wilson argues that most founders know about venture capital and angels but are unaware of the full menu of financing instruments available to them. Different instruments are appropriate at different stages and for different purposes; using the wrong instrument at the wrong time is costly in either dilution or operational constraint. The goal is not to raise the most money — it is to raise the right amount with the right instrument at the right time.

Financing options for small tech companies and startups

Wilson surveys the landscape before discussing individual instruments:

• Pre-product/pre-revenue companies: friends and family, accelerator programs, government grants, and customer pre-sales are the realistic options.
• Early-revenue companies: angels, seed funds, and convertible debt open up.
• Growth-stage companies: institutional venture capital, venture debt, and revenue-based financing become available.
• Scale-stage companies: late-stage venture, growth equity, corporate venture, and debt facilities.

Friends and family

The original source of startup capital. Wilson notes that it comes with no due diligence, no formal process, and strong emotional strings — making it the cheapest and most complicated money a founder will ever raise. He recommends structuring it formally (convertible notes, not informal loans or handshake equity) and communicating the risk of total loss explicitly.

Accelerator programs and contests

Y Combinator, Techstars, and similar programs provide small amounts of capital (typically $25K–$150K for 5–7% equity) plus infrastructure (legal templates, demo day access, alumni networks). Wilson values them primarily for the network and the forcing function of a demo day deadline, not for the capital itself, which is expensive on a percentage basis.

Government grants

SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research) and similar grants provide non-dilutive capital for companies working on specific technology domains (defense, health, clean energy). The trade-off is bureaucratic overhead and often a research-orientation that does not suit commercial startups.

Convertible debt

A loan that converts to equity at a future priced round, typically at a discount (10–20%) or with a valuation cap that limits the conversion price. Wilson is ambivalent about convertible notes: they defer the valuation conversation (helpful when the company is very early) but can create cap table complexity and misaligned incentives when conversion terms are aggressive. He prefers priced rounds when the company has enough traction to support one.

Preferred stock

The standard instrument for institutional venture investment. Preferred stock gives investors the right to either (a) get their negotiated ownership percentage of the acquisition price, or (b) get their invested capital back — whichever is more. Key variations:

• Participating preferred: investors get their money back AND their pro-rata equity share (double-dipping).
• Non-participating preferred: investors choose one or the other (standard in most VC deals today).
• Liquidation preference multiple: some investors negotiate a 2× or 3× preference — they receive two or three times their investment before common stockholders see anything.

Venture debt

A loan to a venture-backed startup, typically sized at 20–30% of the most recent equity round, with warrants attached. Wilson recommends venture debt for companies that want to extend runway without dilution and are confident they will achieve a near-term milestone. The risk is that a struggling company with venture debt faces a covenant violation on top of its operational problems — debt is less forgiving than equity in distress scenarios.

Revenue-based financing

A newer instrument: the investor provides capital in exchange for a fixed percentage of monthly revenues until a predetermined multiple of the original investment is repaid. Wilson views it as appropriate for capital-efficient businesses with predictable recurring revenue that want growth capital without equity dilution.

Cap tables

A capitalization table records every security issued by the company — common stock (founders and employees), preferred stock (investors), options (employee grants), and warrants (attached to debt instruments). Wilson argues that a clean, current, and correctly modeled cap table is one of the hallmarks of a well-managed company, and that founders who cannot produce a cap table on demand are flying blind.

Key ideas

• The full range of startup financing options spans from friends-and-family to late-stage growth equity; most founders use only a subset.
• Convertible notes defer valuation but create complexity; priced rounds are preferable when traction supports them.
• Preferred stock protections (liquidation preference, participation) are negotiated, not standard; founders should understand every term.
• Venture debt extends runway without dilution but is dangerous for companies that may miss milestones.
• Revenue-based financing is appropriate for capital-efficient businesses with predictable revenue.
• Cap table management is a basic hygiene requirement; complexity accumulates and must be actively managed.

Key takeaway

Choosing the right financing instrument at the right stage is as important as the amount raised; an ill-suited instrument creates operational constraints and incentive misalignment that outlast the funding round.

---

Chapter 8 — Burn Rate and Financial Operations

Central question

How should founders track and manage their burn rate, and what does financial operations discipline look like for a capital-constrained startup?

Main argument

Wilson argues that burn rate management is the operational discipline that keeps all other strategies alive. A startup that runs out of cash cannot execute any plan, no matter how good. The CEO should know the company's burn rate, gross burn, net burn, and runway at all times — and should be raising capital at least six months before the number hits zero.

Calculating burn rate

Wilson provides two methods:

1. Back-of-the-envelope: (Starting cash balance − Current cash balance) ÷ number of months elapsed = average monthly burn. This can be computed in a board meeting with two numbers from the balance sheet.
2. Detailed method: sum all monthly cash outflows (gross burn), subtract monthly cash inflows from revenue (net burn). Net burn is the number that determines runway.

Gross burn vs. net burn

Gross burn is total cash spent per month. Net burn is gross burn minus collected revenues. A company with $500K of monthly gross burn and $300K of monthly collections has $200K of net burn. As revenue scales, net burn decreases and eventually turns into net cash generation — the moment the company becomes self-sustaining.

Burn rates by stage

Wilson argues that the appropriate burn rate is not a fixed number — it depends on the company's stage, the clarity of its product-market fit signal, and the availability of capital:

• While building product (pre-product-market fit): burn as little as possible. The goal is to preserve runway while discovering what works. Excessive spending before product-market fit is the single most common startup failure mode.
• After product-market fit: burn faster. Once the company has a clear growth model, the right answer is to pour fuel on it — the risk of burning too little is greater than the risk of burning too much.

Transparency about runway

Wilson advocates sharing burn rate and runway information with employees, not hiding it. A team that understands the company's financial position is better equipped to prioritize correctly, and shared awareness of a funding deadline creates focused urgency rather than free-form panic. Secrecy, by contrast, leads to distorted assumptions and poor individual decisions.

Business arcanery: going concern

Wilson introduces the concept of going concern — the accounting designation used when an auditor believes a company may not survive for the next twelve months. A going concern opinion on an audit is a serious signal: it triggers investor alarm, often constitutes a default on loan covenants, and can become self-fulfilling by causing customers and partners to avoid the company. Founders should understand that a going concern opinion is not just an accounting formality — it is a public declaration of financial distress.

Sustainability

Related to burn rate: Wilson argues that every startup should have a clear and credible path to becoming cash-flow sustainable, even if that path is multiple years away. A startup that cannot articulate how it eventually generates more cash than it spends is not a business — it is a research project. The path to sustainability should be embedded in the financial model and stress-tested against the pessimistic scenario.

Key ideas

• Burn rate, gross burn, and net burn are three distinct numbers; founders must track all three.
• The back-of-the-envelope method (change in cash balance ÷ months elapsed) is sufficient for a directional read.
• Burn rate discipline before product-market fit is existential; burning too fast before PMF is the most common startup failure mode.
• After product-market fit, the risk calculus inverts: under-investing in growth is a strategic error.
• Runway transparency with employees reduces misalignment and creates productive urgency.
• Going concern designations are not accounting formalities; they are distress signals with real operational consequences.

Key takeaway

Burn rate is not a number to manage — it is a number to understand; the management decision it enables is the question of when to invest aggressively and when to preserve runway.

---

Chapter 9 — Mergers and Acquisitions

Central question

How do acquisitions actually work, what drives their pricing, and what should founders and employees know about the process of selling a company?

Main argument

Wilson argues that most founders have a vague understanding of M&A derived from press coverage of large transactions and a false belief that selling a company is primarily about price. In reality, a sale involves a dozen interlocking deal terms — consideration structure, reps and warranties, escrows, integration plans, stay packages, and breakup fees — and the interaction among these terms often determines the real economic outcome for founders and employees as much as the headline price does.

M&A fundamentals: acquisitions vs. mergers

Acquisitions — one company taking control of another — are overwhelmingly more common in startup M&A than true mergers (two similarly-sized companies combining). Wilson's example of a successful startup merger is Return Path and Veripost (2002), but he treats mergers as exceptions. Acquisitions are typically structured as either a stock purchase (the buyer acquires all the target's shares, assuming all liabilities) or an asset purchase (the buyer acquires specific assets and liabilities, leaving the corporate shell behind). Sellers almost always prefer stock sales; asset deals are typically imposed on distressed sellers.

Acquisition finance

How buyers pay for acquisitions:

• Cash: clean, certain, and immediately taxable for the seller.
• Stock: the seller receives shares in the acquirer; the economic outcome depends on the acquirer's subsequent performance. Wilson notes that in his experience, acquirer stock has often appreciated post-closing, making "stock deals work out well" despite their apparent uncertainty.
• Earnouts: a portion of the price is contingent on hitting future milestones. Wilson is skeptical of earnouts — the milestones are always set by the acquirer, who has operational control post-closing and can make it difficult to hit them.

Buying and selling assets

When a company is distressed, creditors, acquirers, or boards may pursue an asset sale. Wilson explains the mechanics: the asset buyer cherry-picks the valuable pieces (technology, customer contracts, key employees) while leaving behind liabilities, litigation, and legacy obligations. For employees, an asset sale is often the worst outcome — they are not automatically employed by the acquirer, and their unvested equity is typically forfeit.

Selling your company: the eight deal issues

Wilson identifies eight issues that must be negotiated in every acquisition:

1. Price: the total consideration. Wilson calls it "the most important issue and also the simplest" — but notes that price is inseparable from the other terms.
2. Consideration: the mix of cash, stock, earnout, and debt. Each form carries different risk and tax treatment for sellers.
3. Representations and warranties: contractual promises by the seller about the accuracy of its financial statements, the absence of undisclosed liabilities, IP ownership, and material contracts. Typically 5–25% of purchase price is held in escrow for 12–24 months as a source of funds for indemnification claims.
4. Integration plan: the buyer's plan for incorporating the acquired company. Wilson emphasizes this strongly — the integration plan determines whether acquired employees are retained, whether the acquired product survives, and whether the strategic rationale for the acquisition is achieved.
5. Stay packages: cash plus vesting equity designed to retain key employees post-acquisition. Wilson argues founders should negotiate stay packages for their key people, not just for themselves.
6. Governmental approvals: required by antitrust regulators for large transactions. Typically only relevant for deals above $100 million.
7. Breakup fees: compensation paid by the acquirer if it walks away from a signed deal. Acquirers resist them, but they provide sellers with insurance against a deal that collapses after management has been distracted for months.
8. Timing: acquisitions take three to six months from term sheet to closing. During that time, the acquired company's management is heavily distracted and business performance typically suffers.

M&A case studies

Wilson illustrates M&A concepts through real transactions involving companies he worked with:

• ChiliSoft: an early example of a technology asset sale. Wilson uses it to illustrate how asset deals work in practice.
• WhatCounts: a full sale-process case study, including the tension between accepting the first offer and running a competitive process to maximize price. The lesson is that controlled competitive processes produce better outcomes than sole-buyer negotiations.
• Feedburner: acquired by Google in 2007 for approximately $100 million. Wilson uses it to illustrate the stock-vs-cash decision and the cultural integration challenge when a small startup is absorbed into a very large company.

Key ideas

• Acquisitions are the dominant form of startup exit; true mergers are rare and organizationally complicated.
• Stock sales and asset sales have fundamentally different implications for sellers; healthy companies should refuse asset deals.
• The eight deal issues interact: a high price with an aggressive escrow and hostile reps/warranties is often worse than a lower price with a clean structure.
• Integration plans determine whether the strategic rationale of the acquisition is ever realized.
• "Companies are bought, not sold" — acquirers typically approach targets they know; founders should cultivate relationships with potential acquirers years before they need to sell.
• Earnouts are almost always to the seller's disadvantage; the buyer controls the post-closing operating environment.

Key takeaway

The headline acquisition price is the least predictive term in an M&A deal; the structure of consideration, escrows, integration plans, and timing collectively determine the real outcome for founders, employees, and investors.

---

Chapter 10 — The Board of Directors

Central question

What is a startup board's role, how should it be composed and run, and how do founders build a board that provides genuine governance and strategic value?

Main argument

Wilson argues that most startup founders think about the board primarily as a source of capital and an oversight body to be managed — and that this framing produces bad boards and bad outcomes. A well-constructed board is a strategic resource: it provides perspective the management team lacks, holds management accountable in a way that investors alone cannot, and provides guidance through the specific crises (a key departure, an acquisition approach, a down round) that every company eventually faces.

Role and responsibilities

A startup board has three primary functions:

1. Governance: ensuring the company is managed in the interests of all shareholders, not just the founders or the management team. This includes approving major financial decisions (new financings, acquisitions, large contracts), overseeing financial reporting, and ensuring the company is complying with its legal obligations.
2. Oversight of the CEO: the board hires, compensates, evaluates, and when necessary replaces the CEO. This is the most consequential power a board has and the one founders most commonly ignore when building the board.
3. Strategic guidance: providing access to networks, expertise, and perspective that the management team does not have internally.

Selecting, electing, and evolving the board

Wilson describes the typical evolution of a startup board:

• At founding: two to three founders; no outside board members. Simple majority governance.
• After seed financing: one or two lead investors join; board may expand to five.
• After Series A: lead investor takes a board seat; board typically becomes five members (two founders, two investors, one independent).
• Growth stage: board evolves to seven to nine members; audit and compensation committees form; independent directors become essential for governance credibility.

The right independent director is more valuable than most founders realize: an independent who has deep domain expertise, strong networks, and genuine interest in the company provides a perspective that neither founders nor investors can replicate.

The board chair

The board chair runs board meetings, sets the agenda, mediates between management and investors, and — in moments of crisis — leads the board's response. Wilson argues that the chair should be someone the CEO trusts and who has the board's confidence, and that the CEO and chair should be the same person only when the CEO is exceptionally strong and the investor representation on the board is relatively light.

Board chemistry

Boards are small groups of people making consequential decisions under uncertainty, and interpersonal dynamics matter enormously. Wilson identifies the most common failure modes: a board dominated by one strong personality whose opinions go unchallenged; a board whose members are too polite to deliver honest feedback to the CEO; and a board whose composition (too many investors relative to independents) creates structural conflicts of interest. The best boards have "productive tension" — members who disagree with each other respectfully and force decisions to be made on the merits.

Board meetings

Wilson's framework for effective board meetings:

• Frequency: monthly for early-stage companies (high uncertainty requires frequent check-ins); quarterly for mature companies.
• Materials: a board package distributed at least 48 hours in advance, including the financial statements, key metrics dashboard, and one or two strategic topics for discussion.
• Agenda structure: financials and metrics review (30 minutes), followed by one or two strategic topics (60–90 minutes), followed by the CEO update and action items.
• Executive sessions: time at the end of each meeting for board members to meet without management. Wilson views executive sessions as healthy and argues founders should not be threatened by them — they are the venue where the board develops independent judgment.

Board committees

As companies scale, boards delegate specific oversight functions to committees:

• Audit committee: oversees financial reporting, internal controls, and the relationship with the external auditor. Required for public companies; strongly recommended for later-stage private companies.
• Compensation committee: sets executive pay, oversees the equity plan, and ensures executive compensation is aligned with company performance.
• Nominating/governance committee: manages board composition, succession planning, and governance practices.

Key ideas

• The board's three functions are governance, CEO oversight, and strategic guidance — not just approval of management's plans.
• Board composition evolves predictably through funding stages; the critical transition is adding independent directors with real expertise.
• The independent director is the most undervalued board seat in most startup companies.
• Board chair and CEO roles should be separated when possible; the chair's role is to run the board, not the company.
• Productive tension — honest disagreement among members — is a feature, not a bug.
• Executive sessions are healthy governance practice and should not be a source of founder anxiety.
• Board committees (audit, compensation) are required at scale and provide specialized governance that full-board discussions cannot.

Key takeaway

A startup board is not a formality or an oversight burden — it is a governance structure that, if designed and run well, provides the management team with accountability, perspective, and access to resources it cannot generate internally.

---

The book's overall argument

1. Chapter 1 (Finance and Accounting Foundations) — Every business decision rests on a small set of financial concepts — time value of money, compounding, ROI, discounting, corporate structure — and founders who do not understand them are operating without instruments.

2. Chapter 2 (Accounting: The Three Financial Statements) — The P&L, balance sheet, and cash flow statement form a closed model of financial reality; the most important single concept is that profitability and cash generation are different and can diverge sharply.

3. Chapter 3 (Building a Company: Budgeting, Projections, and Key Metrics) — Financial planning is how founders communicate their business model to everyone who needs to act on it; the discipline of building three-scenario forecasts and distinguishing bookings from revenues from collections is basic operational hygiene.

4. Chapter 4 (Economics and Finance Concepts for Operators) — A handful of economic concepts — opportunity cost, sunk costs, risk/return, diversification — if internalized, directly improve dozens of recurring decisions; the failure to apply them is not ignorance but cognitive bias that must be actively countered.

5. Chapter 5 (Employee Equity) — Equity compensation is a co-ownership structure whose power depends entirely on employees understanding it; vesting, dilution, liquidation preferences, and option mechanics are not arcane — they are learnable, and founders who teach them build more aligned teams.

6. Chapter 6 (Operations: What Management Teams Actually Do) — The CEO has exactly three jobs; the management team exists to extend the CEO's capacity across functional areas; both must be designed to match the company's current stage, not a future ideal state.

7. Chapter 7 (Financing Options) — The full menu of financing instruments — from friends-and-family to preferred stock to revenue-based financing — has distinct trade-offs; using the wrong instrument at the wrong stage produces dilution, operational constraint, or misaligned incentives that outlast the funding round.

8. Chapter 8 (Burn Rate and Financial Operations) — Burn rate is the operating constraint that makes all other strategies possible or impossible; the discipline of tracking net burn, understanding runway, and raising capital six months early is not conservatism — it is the baseline competence required to stay in the game.

9. Chapter 9 (Mergers and Acquisitions) — Acquisitions are the most common form of startup exit; the headline price is the least predictive term; the structure of consideration, escrows, integration plans, and timing collectively determine whether founders, employees, and investors actually receive the value that price implies.

10. Chapter 10 (The Board of Directors) — A startup board is not an oversight burden but a governance structure; founders who design it well — with independent directors, clear roles, productive tension, and disciplined meeting practices — build an accountability system that catches their own blind spots.

---

Common misunderstandings

Misunderstanding: Revenue and cash are the same thing.

They are not. Revenue is recognized when earned (accrual accounting); cash is received when collected. A company with $1M of monthly revenue and 90-day payment terms collects only $330K of that revenue in the month it is earned. Cash flow statements and bank balances are the operational reality; the P&L is an accounting model of economic activity.

Misunderstanding: Dilution is always bad.

Dilution — the reduction in ownership percentage from new share issuances — is mathematically inevitable in a venture-backed company. It is only harmful if the new capital is misallocated. A founder who goes from 70% to 25% ownership as the company grows from a $5M valuation to a $200M valuation is better off in absolute dollar terms despite holding a smaller percentage.

Misunderstanding: The acquisition price is what founders actually receive.

The headline price in an acquisition announcement is the total consideration before escrows, earnouts, liquidation preferences, and employee retention packages. After preferred investors receive their liquidation preferences, escrow holdbacks are deducted, and stay packages are distributed, common stockholders (including founders and employees) may receive significantly less than the headline implies — or in some cases, nothing at all.

Misunderstanding: The CEO's job is to make the most important decisions.

Wilson argues the opposite: the CEO's job is to set the vision, build the team, and ensure financial survival — and then delegate everything else. A CEO who is the primary decision-maker for product, engineering, marketing, and operations simultaneously is a bottleneck, not a leader.

Misunderstanding: A board is primarily a source of capital.

A board that functions as a collection of investor representatives whose primary interest is return on capital is a failed governance structure. Boards exist to govern — to hold management accountable, to provide independent perspective, and to make the hard decisions (including replacing the CEO) that management cannot make about itself.

Misunderstanding: Burn rate management is for struggling companies.

Burn rate discipline is a baseline competence required of every startup, including healthy ones. The company that tracks its burn rate, knows its runway, and raises capital on a deliberate timeline is not being conservative — it is managing its primary operating constraint. Complacency about burn rate is how healthy companies become distressed ones.

---

Central paradox / key insight

The central paradox of MBA Mondays is that the business concepts founders most need to understand are the ones they are most likely to dismiss as irrelevant to building a product. Wilson's central observation — made implicitly throughout the series — is that operational and financial ignorance does not protect founders from financial reality; it just makes them less able to navigate it.

A startup that does not understand its gross margin is making pricing decisions in the dark. A startup that does not understand dilution is negotiating equity packages without knowing the rules. A startup that does not understand burn rate is scheduling its own death without knowing the date. The paradox is that the most technically sophisticated founders — the ones most confident in their ability to build something new — are often the most resistant to learning the business fundamentals that would let them keep what they build.

Wilson's resolution is that none of these concepts is actually hard. The time value of money can be explained in two paragraphs. A cap table is a spreadsheet. A burn rate is arithmetic. The barrier is not mathematical complexity — it is the cultural myth in startup culture that business fundamentals are bureaucratic overhead rather than the operational language of every significant decision the company will make.

The most expensive ignorance in startups is not ignorance of technology or markets — it is ignorance of the financial mechanics that determine whether the company survives long enough for any of its other decisions to matter.

---

Important concepts

Accrual accounting

The accounting method in which revenues are recognized when earned (not when collected) and expenses are recognized when incurred (not when paid). Contrasts with cash accounting, which records transactions only when cash changes hands. Accrual accounting produces a more accurate picture of economic activity but decouples the P&L from cash flow.

Bookings

A customer's commitment to purchase; typically recorded when a contract is signed. Bookings precede revenue (the service must still be delivered) and collections (the invoice must still be paid). Bookings are a leading indicator of future revenue, not a financial statement item.

Burn rate

The net cash consumed by the company per month: gross cash outflows minus cash inflows from revenue. Burn rate divided into current cash balance equals runway in months.

Cap table

A capitalization table recording every security issued by a company — founder common stock, investor preferred stock, employee options, and warrants — along with ownership percentages on a fully diluted basis.

Double-trigger acceleration

An equity provision under which unvested options or shares accelerate to full vesting only when both (1) a change of control occurs and (2) the employee is subsequently terminated or materially demoted. Protects employees without creating single-trigger deterrents to acquisitions.

EBITDA

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. A common proxy for operating cash flow used in acquisition pricing and public market comparables. Technology company EBITDA multiples typically range from 10× to 20× depending on growth rate and gross margin profile.

Enterprise value

The value of a company's operations: market capitalization plus debt minus cash. The correct unit for M&A comparisons, in contrast to market capitalization (which includes the company's cash balance as part of its value).

Going concern

An auditor's designation that a company may not survive for the next twelve months. A going concern opinion triggers investor alarm, often constitutes a default on loan covenants, and can become self-fulfilling by causing customers and partners to withdraw.

Gross margin

Revenue minus cost of revenues, divided by revenue. The percentage of each revenue dollar the company retains after paying the direct costs of delivering the product or service. High gross margin (>70%) is the defining financial characteristic of great software businesses.

Liquidation preference

An investor's right to receive their invested capital back (or a multiple of it) before common stockholders receive any proceeds in a sale or liquidation. In a participating preferred structure, investors receive their preference and then participate pro-rata in remaining proceeds — double-dipping.

Liquidation overhang

The situation in which outstanding option grants have a strike price above the current company valuation, rendering them economically worthless. Common after down rounds; must be actively managed through repricing or new grants to restore motivational value.

Net burn

Gross monthly cash expenditures minus monthly cash revenues collected. The number that determines how many months the company can operate at its current trajectory.

Options (stock options)

Rights granted to employees to purchase company stock at a fixed strike price (set to fair market value at the grant date) for a defined period. ISOs (incentive stock options) receive preferential tax treatment for employees; NQSOs (non-qualified stock options) do not.

Present value

The current worth of a future cash flow, discounted by an appropriate rate of return: PV = FV / (1 + r)^n. Companies are theoretically worth the present value of all their future cash flows, discounted at a rate that reflects the risk of those cash flows.

Runway

The number of months a company can operate at its current net burn rate before its cash balance reaches zero. Standard guidance: raise new capital when runway falls below six months.

Vesting

The mechanism by which employees earn their equity grants over time. Standard structure: four-year total vesting period with a one-year cliff (no vesting until twelve months of service), then monthly vesting for the remaining three years.

---

References and Web Links

Primary book and edition information

• Fred Wilson. MBA Mondays. Leanpub, 2013.

  • MBA Mondays on Leanpub (book page and preview)

• Fred Wilson and Jason Li. MBA Mondays Illustrated. mba-mondays-illustrated.com, 2015.

  • MBA Mondays Illustrated – full illustrated edition

Original blog archive

• Fred Wilson. AVC.com MBA Mondays category archive (all original posts, 2010–2013).
  • MBA Mondays Archives — AVC.com
  • MBA Mondays — AVC.com 2017 summary post

Key individual posts (primary sources)

• Fred Wilson. "The Time Value of Money." AVC.com, 2010.

  • The Time Value of Money — AVC

• Fred Wilson. "The Profit and Loss Statement." AVC.com, 2010.

  • The Profit and Loss Statement — AVC

• Fred Wilson. "Cash Flow." AVC.com, 2010.

  • Cash Flow — AVC

• Fred Wilson. "What a CEO Does." AVC.com, 2010.

  • What a CEO Does — AVC

• Fred Wilson. "M&A Fundamentals." AVC.com, 2010.

  • M&A Fundamentals — AVC

• Fred Wilson. "Selling Your Company." AVC.com, 2010.

  • Selling Your Company — AVC

• Fred Wilson. "Employee Equity: Options." AVC.com, 2010.

  • Employee Equity: Options — AVC

• Fred Wilson. "Employee Equity: Vesting." AVC.com, 2010.

  • Employee Equity: Vesting — AVC

• Fred Wilson. "Employee Equity: How Much?" AVC.com, 2010.

  • Employee Equity: How Much? — AVC

• Fred Wilson. "MBA Mondays: Cap Tables." AVC.com, 2011.

  • Cap Tables — AVC

MBA Mondays Illustrated — key illustrated posts

• M&A Fundamentals — MBA Mondays Illustrated
• Burn Rate — MBA Mondays Illustrated
• Cash Flow — MBA Mondays Illustrated
• Pricing A Follow-On Venture Investment — MBA Mondays Illustrated
• What A CEO Does — MBA Mondays Illustrated
• Board of Directors Series — MBA Mondays Illustrated

USV archive

• MBA Mondays Archives — Union Square Ventures

Podcast (audio versions of original posts)

• MBAMondays Podcast — Apple Podcasts
• MBAMondays Podcast — SoundCloud

Additional chapter summaries and study resources

These are secondary summaries and should be used alongside, rather than instead of, the original posts.

• Fred Wilson's Goodreads page for MBA Mondays: Fred Wilson's MBA Mondays — Goodreads
• Wattpad collection (104 parts): MBA Mondays on Wattpad